4.5 Article

Comparing economic model predictive control to basic and advanced regulatory control on a simulated high-pressure grinding rolls, ball mill, and flotation circuit

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL
卷 122, 期 -, 页码 159-171

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2023.01.005

关键词

Economic model predictive control; Mineral processing; Grinding; Flotation; Decentralized PID control; Override control

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mineral processing plants have a reputation for low energy efficiency. Economic model predictive control (EMPC) could potentially reduce their environmental footprint by considering energy costs, but its benefits are yet to be quantified. This study compared the response of an EMPC system to ore feed disturbances with basic and advanced regulatory control systems, using profits and specific energy as metrics. The results showed that the advanced regulatory control system generated more revenue and had lower energy consumption than the basic system, and EMPC could trade revenue for lower energy consumption with a hybrid criterion.
Mineral processing plants remain nowadays infamous for their low energy efficiency. Economic model predictive control (EMPC), by directly considering the energy costs, could possibly help reduce their footprint, but its environmental benefits are yet to be clearly quantified. In an attempt to cast some light on this topic, this paper compares the response to a given ore feed size and hardness disturbance sequence of an EMPC to that of basic and advanced regulatory control systems using the profits and the specific energy (power draw/ore feed rate) as metrics. The simulated circuit comprises a high-pressure grinding rolls (HPGR), a ball mill, and a flotation circuit. It is based on population balance modeling and is an extension of previous works. The basic regulatory control (BRC) system comprises only single-input-single-output control loops with proportional-integral (PI) controllers and operates at a fixed feed rate. The advanced regulatory control (ARC) system consists of PI controllers maximizing the plant feed rate with override constraint handling. The results show that (1) ARC generates more revenue and maintains a lower circuit specific energy consumption than BRC, (2) ARC can produce the same economic performance as EMPC because the constraints of the system define the economic optimum, and (3) EMPC can trade revenues for a lower circuit specific energy with a hybrid criterion that penalizes power draw.(c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据