4.8 Article

High performance nanocomposite proton exchange membranes based on the nanohybrids formed by chemically bonding phosphotungstic acid with covalent organic frameworks

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 554, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232332

关键词

Proton exchange membrane fuel cell; Nafion; Phosphotungstic acid; Covalent organic frameworks; Hydrothermal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully improved the performance of proton exchange membranes under low humidity by synthesizing phospho-tungstic acid functionalized covalent organic framework nanohybrids, further advancing the development of PEM fuel cells.
The performance deterioration of the proton exchange membranes (PEMs) under low humidity is one of the key issues hindering the further development of PEM fuel cells (PEMFCs). Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) offer the possibility of facilitating proton transport due to their structural advantages such as ordered pore networks and tunable functionalities. In this work, we have applied a hydrothermal method to synthesize the phospho-tungstic acid (HPW) functionalized covalent organic framework (COF) nanohybrids (P-COF), in which the HPW is immobilized within the cavities of COF through the chemical bonds. The strong acidity of HPW and the or-dered structure of P-COF facilitates the fast and efficient proton conduction in the Nafion/P-COF nanocomposite membranes, resulting in superior proton conductivity along with outstanding performance in H2/O2 PEMFCs under low humidity. At 25 degrees C under 55% RH, the proton conductivity of Nafion nanocomposite membrane with 4 wt% P-COF (Nafion/P-COF-4) reaches a proton conductivity of 0.061 S cm-1, which is 307% higher than that of the recast Nafion. The membrane electrode assembly (MEA) based on Nafion/P-COF-4 membrane exhibits excellent performance in a H2/O2 fuel cell, achieving the peak power density of 724 mW cm-2 at 80 degrees C and 50% RH, 138% higher than the MEA based on the recast Nafion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据