4.8 Article

A robust numerical treatment of solid-phase diffusion in pseudo two-dimensional lithium-ion battery models

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 556, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232413

关键词

Numerical algorithm; Battery modeling; Fast charging; Battery solver; Solid-state diffusion; Pseudo-two-dimensional model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study discusses the numerical instabilities that may occur when solving solid-phase diffusion equations in lithium-ion batteries and proposes a simple numerical treatment to resolve these issues. The proposed method is implemented in a pseudo two-dimensional physics-based battery model and simulations show its numerical robustness and comparable computational speeds to conventional methods.
Solid-phase diffusion in active materials of lithium-ion batteries significantly affects charging and safety-related behavior of lithium-ion batteries. Therefore, it is essential to develop an efficient and robust numerical algorithm for solving solid-phase diffusion equations in physics-based battery models. In this work, we discuss the origins of numerical instabilities that can occur when solving the solid-phase diffusion equations using iterative methods. Then, in order to resolve such issues, we propose a simple numerical treatment to the surface flux term of dis-cretized solid-phase diffusion equations. To demonstrate its numerical robustness, the proposed method is implemented into a pseudo two-dimensional (P2D) physics-based battery model and simulations are conducted at wide ranges of operating conditions. Even with extremely poor initial guesses for the Li+ concentrations of the active materials, computations using the proposed method do not diverge and the their computational speeds are comparable to those with conventional initial guesses. Comprehensive tests of the proposed method are also performed with a dynamic current profile based on US06 driving profile and a multi-stage charging profile with very high initial C-rate (12C).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据