4.8 Article

Differences in the deterioration behaviors of fast-charged lithium-ion batteries at high and low temperatures

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 556, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232513

关键词

High temperature; Low temperature; High rate; Cycling aging; Electrochemical characterization; X-ray microcomputed tomography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Demand for stationary storage batteries that store electricity from natural energy sources, such as solar power, is increasing. This study investigates the cycle deterioration behaviors of Li-ion batteries (LIBs) at different operating temperatures and high rates of charge. The results show that capacity decrease is more severe at low temperatures, and considerable deterioration is observed at temperatures outside the safe range. The mechanisms of battery deterioration differ at high and low temperatures, as confirmed by activation energy analysis.
Demand for stationary storage batteries, which store electricity generated by natural energy, such as solar en-ergy, is increasing. These Li-ion batteries (LIBs) may be used outside their safe temperature ranges, depending on the usage environment, and they are required to charge as rapidly as possible when used frequently. Therefore, the cycle deterioration behaviors of LIBs at different operating temperatures at high rates of charge are studied here. Compared with the deterioration at high temperatures, the decrease in battery capacity at low temperatures is higher, and more severe deterioration is observed at temperatures that differ considerably from the safe temperature range. Based on differential capacity analysis, the peaks corresponding to the anode are significantly reduced at the potential of the initial charging stage after cycle deterioration at low temperatures. Therefore, the number of Li ions intercalated into/deintercalated from the graphite layer decreases. The activation energies of deterioration confirm that the mechanisms of battery deterioration differ at high and low temperatures, based on

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据