4.6 Article

A Promising Antibacterial Wound Dressing Made of Electrospun Poly (Glycerol Sebacate) (PGS)/Gelatin with Local Delivery of Ascorbic Acid and Pantothenic Acid

期刊

JOURNAL OF POLYMERS AND THE ENVIRONMENT
卷 31, 期 6, 页码 2504-2518

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10924-022-02715-8

关键词

Vitamin C; Vitamin B5; Controlled release; Wound healing; EDC/NHS; Cross-linking

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a novel wound dressing containing vitamin B5 and vitamin C was fabricated using electrospinning. The dressing showed good physical properties, antibacterial activity, and cytotoxicity, making it suitable for wound healing.
Skin wounds can lead to numerous problems with dangerous health consequences. One of the best treatments for chronic wounds is using novel wound dressings containing drugs and vitamins to improve healing. In this study, Poly (Glycerol Sebacate) (PGS)/Gelatin wound dressing, containing vitamin B5 and vitamin C, was fabricated by electrospinning. In addition, the fabricated dressing's structure, physical properties, drug release, antibacterial activity, and cytotoxicity were evaluated. Results revealed that the diameter of the fibers PGS-G/VitB5 was 603.155 & PLUSMN; 12.09 nm. Furthermore, the degradation results showed that about 20% of cross-linked PGS-G/Vit B5/Vit C was degraded during 14 days but could maintain its stability well. The water absorption and contact angle of cross-linked PGS-G/Vit B5/Vit C were 605% and 52 degrees, respectively. Moreover, the vitamins C and B5 releases demonstrated the burst release during 1 and 6 h, respectively. Antibacterial results also demonstrated that vitamin B5 in PGS/gelatin wound dressing could prevent gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria growth. According to the cell viability assay, vitamin C enhanced cell adhesion and cell proliferation. Finally, a suitable wound healing product was recommended with the PGS/gelatin with vitamin C/vitamin B5 wound dressing with ideal biological properties. [GRAPHICS]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据