4.6 Article

Accumulation effect of active species in atmospheric-pressure plasma jet driven by nanosecond high-voltage pulses with MHz pulse repetition rate

期刊

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/acb71d

关键词

nanosecond pulsed discharge; atmospheric-pressure plasma; pulse repetition rate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a bipolar nanosecond high-voltage pulse generator was developed to generate an atmospheric-pressure plasma jet. The influence of pulse intervals on the generation of active species and energy branching was explored. It was found that pulse intervals can effectively modulate the generation of certain active species and increase the energy fraction of vibrational excitation.
With respect to successful applications of pulsed power in gas discharges, the enhanced generation of desired active species and control of plasma parameters as required are always decisive issues. In this study, a bipolar nanosecond high-voltage pulse generator with a maximum pulse repetition rate (PRR) of up to 1 MHz (i.e. a minimum pulse interval of 1 mu s) in burst mode is developed, based on the principle of full-bridge converter and pulse transformer. This pulse source is used to generate an atmospheric-pressure plasma jet in Ar + 1%CH4 gas flow, and the influence of pulse intervals (from 1-10 mu s) is explored. It is found that the pulse interval can strongly modulate the active species, i.e. a short pulse interval enhances the generation of C-2 radial and H atom due to the accumulation effect, when the pulse interval is comparable with their lifetime, while it slightly suppresses the generation of Ar excited states and the energy fraction into electronic excitation. Reduced pulse intervals also prominently increase the energy fraction of vibrational excitation. This study demonstrates how the PRR effectively modulates active species and energy branching and enhances the generation of certain active species in atmospheric-pressure plasma driven by pulsed power.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据