4.5 Article

Improved thermoelectric properties of n-type polycrystalline SnSe via carrier concentration optimization

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2022.111077

关键词

n-type SnSe; Electrical conductivity; (Hf Cl)-co doping; Lattice thermal conductivity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polycrystalline SnSe thermoelectric materials have attracted much attention due to their low thermal conductivity and desirable mechanical properties, but their low electrical conductivity limits their application. By introducing Hf and Cl substitution, more electrons were released, resulting in a high electrical conductivity of 33 S cm-1 for the SnSe0.95+1 wt%HfCl4 sample, about 5 times higher than that of SnSe0.95 sample. The lattice thermal conductivity was suppressed due to the enhanced phonon scattering caused by the decrease of grain size, leading to a low thermal conductivity of 0.33 W m-1 K-1 for the SnSe0.95+4 wt%HfCl4 sample. As a result, a peak ZT value of -1.1 was achieved for the SnSe0.95+3 wt%HfCl4 sample at 773 K.
Polycrystalline SnSe thermoelectric materials have received extensive interests owing to the low thermal con-ductivity and available mechanical properties. However, the low electrical conductivity seriously hinders its application. In this work, stemming from the introducing of Hf and Cl substitution, they released more electrons. Owing to the improved carrier concentration, a high electrical conductivity of 33 S cm-1 for the SnSe0.95+1 wt% HfCl4 sample was obtained at 773 K, about 5 times as much as that of the SnSe0.95 sample. Thus, a peak power factor of 553.8 mu Wm- 1 K-2 of SnSe0.95+3 wt%HfCl4 sample at 773 K was obtained. Meanwhile, the phonon scattering was enhanced due to the decrease of grain size, the lattice thermal conductivity was suppressed. The pretty low xl of 0.33 W m-1 K-1 was obtained at 773 K for the SnSe0.95+4 wt%HfCl4 sample. Consequently, the peak ZT value of-1.1 was achieved for SnSe0.95+3 wt%HfCl4 sample at 773 K.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据