4.5 Article

Markov State Models Underlying the N-Terminal Premodel of TOPK/ PBK

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 126, 期 50, 页码 10662-10671

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c06559

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. National Science Fund for Outstanding Young Scholars
  3. [11774279]
  4. [11774280]
  5. [11922410]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the micromechanism of TOPK, a potential target for cancer therapy, through modeling and simulation. The results showed that the ENI motif of the NTPM is regulated by the N-C interaction zone, and mutations at specific residues promote conformational changes and phosphorylation. Furthermore, allosteric effects induce structural changes that are important for activation or binding. These findings provide insights for designing inhibitors and understanding the regulatory mechanisms of TOPK monomers.
Lymphokine-activated killer T-cell-originated protein kinase (TOPK) is a potential target for cancer therapy. To explore the micromechanism, we proposed the N-terminal premodel (NTPM) of the TOPK monomer via homology modeling and molecular dynamic simulations and analyzed the conformational dynamics by Markov state model analysis. The electronegative insert (ENI) motif of the NTPM can be opened with a small probability under wild type, regulated by the so-called N-C interaction zone consisting of the N-terminal head, the coil between beta 3-strand and alpha C-helix, and the ENI motif. Glutamate substitution at threonine residue 9 or tyrosine residue 74 promotes the closed-open transition, revealing the details of phosphorylation. Allosteric effects induce functionally relevant structural changes, such as increased structural flexibility and active sites, which are thought to be necessary for further activation or binding. These findings provide rational structural templates for designing state-dependent inhibitors and give insight into the molecular regulatory mechanisms of TOPK monomers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据