4.4 Article

Customized Postoperative Therapy Improves Bile Drainage in Biliary Atresia: A Single Center Preliminary Report

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY
卷 58, 期 8, 页码 1483-1488

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2022.10.050

关键词

Biliary atresia; Hepatoportoenterostomy; Kasai; Cholestasis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of personalized use of antibiotics and corticosteroids in patients with biliary atresia after surgery. The results showed that the personalized medication group had a significantly higher success rate of bile drainage compared to the conventional treatment group, and also maintained more native livers at 2 years. Therefore, personalized medication may help improve postoperative bile drainage.
Background: Controversies in management of biliary atresia (BA) after hepatoportoenterostomy (HPE) lead to variable treatment protocols. We implemented standardized medical management after HPE, cus-tomizing the use of antibiotics and corticosteroids based on patient-specific factors. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, 20 consecutive infants underwent HPE for BA and were compared to a historical cohort. Analysis of successful biliary drainage 3 months after HPE (defined as serum total bilirubin < 2 mg/dL) was the primary endpoint; survival with native liver at 2 years was the secondary endpoint. Results: Sixteen of 20 (80%) infants had successful bile drainage, compared to 8 of 20 (40%) infants in the historical cohort ( P = 0.0225). Sixteen of 20 patients in the new protocol have reached 2 years of age or required liver transplantation. Among the sixteen, 11 (68.8%) are alive with native livers versus 10 of 20 (50%) in the historical cohort ( P = 0.0970). Conclusion: This preliminary report suggests the potential benefit of tailored use of postoperative antibi-otics and corticosteroids in improving biliary drainage after HPE. Level of evidence: III. & COPY; 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据