4.7 Article

From Concept to Regulatory Drug Approval: Lessons for Theranostics

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
卷 63, 期 12, 页码 1793-1801

出版社

SOC NUCLEAR MEDICINE INC
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263301

关键词

theranostics; PSMA; FDA; drug approval; radium; lutetium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Radiopharmaceutical therapy plays an important role in cancer treatment, especially for prostate cancer, which has a prolonged disease course, tendency for metastasis, and sensitivity to radiation therapy. This review summarizes the complex processes of obtaining regulatory approval for radiopharmaceutical agents and highlights the importance of trial design for advanced prostate cancer. The successful approval experiences of 223Ra and 177Lu-PSMA-617 are outlined.
Radiopharmaceutical therapy is an emerging treatment modality that has demonstrated increasing importance as a significant component in the treatment of cancer. Prostate cancer (PCa) remains one of the commonest solid-organ tumors and is associated with significant societal burdens. Despite significant disease heterogeneity, PCa remains an ideal candidate for radiopharmaceutical therapy because of the prolonged disease course, metastatic disease tropism, and sensitivity to radiation therapy. To date, advanced PCa remains one of the most successful arenas for the development and approval of radiopharmaceutical agents. In this review, we aim to summarize the complex processes required to obtain regulatory approval for a novel agent and highlight the limitations and hurdles specific to the approval of radiopharmaceutical agents. In advanced PCa, we outline the importance of a framework for trial design with respect to defining dis-ease state and acceptable outcome measures-as recommended by the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group (PCWG). Finally, using the principles mandated by the Food and Drug Administration approval process and the framework provided by the PCWG, we out-line experience with the successful approval of the radiopharmaceuti-cal agents 223Ra and 177Lu-PSMA-617.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据