4.6 Article

Design, synthesis, molecular docking and biological evaluation of /3-carboline derivatives as cholinesterase inhibitors

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
卷 1273, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.134291

关键词

3-carboline; Benzylpiperazine; Benzoylpiperazine; Virtual screening; Acetylcholinesterase; Butyrylcholinesterase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A set of novel /3-carboline derivatives were designed and subjected to virtual screening studies by molecular docking in AChE. Among them, derivatives 1a-c, 2a, 3d-f, and 4d,e showed promising inhibition of AChE and BuChE. The results suggest that the design and selection strategies used in this study were efficient in the development of new dual-targeted AChE/BuChE inhibitors.
A set of novel /3-carboline derivatives were designed and subjected to virtual screening studies by molecular docking in AChE. Among the compounds investigated, derivatives 1a-c , 2a , 3d-f and 4d,e showed lower scores than donepezil (reference compound) and reproducibility in Autodock and Autodock Vina programs. These derivatives were synthesized and evaluated in vitro against AChE and BuChE. The derivatives 4d and 4e displayed the highest inhibition of AChE, with IC 50 values of 3.2 +/- 0.4 mu M and 4.8 +/- 0.1 mu M, respectively, while 1a-c were the best inhibitors of BuChE, displaying IC 50 values of 0.6, 0.9 and 0.8 mu M, respectively. Kinetic studies indicated that 1a and 4d are AChE inhibitors of mixed type, and BuChE inhibitors of mixed and competitive types, respectively. Molecular docking studies showed that 1a and 4d interacted similarly with the peripheral anionic and catalytic active sites of AChE while only 4d exhibited interaction by hydrogen bonding with Ser198 of the catalytic triad of BuChE, which confirmed the modes of inhibition of 1a and 4d obtained in the kinetic studies. Our results demonstrate that the strategies used to design and select novel compounds were efficient in the development of new AChE/BuChE dual-targeted inhibitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据