4.7 Article

Generic bond energy formalism within the modified quasichemical model for ternary solutions

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
卷 370, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2022.120932

关键词

Thermodynamics; Geometrical interpolation method; Quasichemcial model; Short-range ordering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Modified Quasichemical Model in the Pair Approximation (MQMPA) is effective for capturing the thermodynamic characteristics of binary solutions with Short-Range Ordering (SRO). When applied to ternary solutions, a geometric interpolation method is needed to extend the bond energy expression. This paper aims to implement such extension through a generic geometric interpolation approach.
The Modified Quasichemical Model in the Pair Approximation (MQMPA) can effectively capture the thermodynamic features of a binary solution with Short-Range Ordering (SRO). If the model is used to treat a ternary solution, a geometric interpolation method must be employed to extend the bond energy expression from binary to ternary formalism. The aim of the present work is to implement such extension by means of a generic geometric interpolation approach. The generic method is unbiased and can be transformed into the widely used Kohler, Toop and Muggianu approaches with special interpolation parameters. The interpolation parameters can be calculated by the integration method as well as be optimized by ternary experimental data. The generic bond energy formalism (GBEF) has thus been derived to provide the MQMPA great flexibility to describe ternary solutions with complex configurations. Moreover, the GBEF is more concise than the formula derived by a combinatorial Kohler-Toop method. The concise GBEF is in the respect more conveniently programmed. Eventually, the Cu-Li-Sn liquid where both SRO and clustering among atoms occur is employed to validate the effectiveness and reliability of the GBEF within the MQMPA.& COPY; 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据