4.7 Article

The effects of C2-methylation of imidazolium-based ionic liquid electrolytes on the lithium-ion transport

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
卷 369, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2022.120815

关键词

Molecular dynamics simulation; Ionic liquid; Electrolyte; C2-methylation; Transference number

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In salt-in-ionic liquid electrolytes (SILEs), the coordination of lithium ion (Li+) with its anions affects the internal resistance and the formation of Li+-containing agglomerates (AGGs). Molecular dynamics simulations showed that a methyl substitution in the imidazolium cation can release trapped Li+ ions and reduce the formation of AGGs. This structural modification alters the transport properties of SILEs and improves the transference number of Li+.
In salt-in-ionic liquid electrolytes (SILEs), the wrong drifting direction of lithium ion (Li+) with its coordinating anions raises the internal resistance and limits the applications of SILEs in lithium (ion) batteries. By applying molecular dynamics simulations to study two imidazolium-based SILEs, both with 0.25 molar fraction of lithium salt, we found that the trapped Li+ by counter ions is more easily released by a methyl substitution of the acidic H2-atom in 1-butyl-3-methyl-imidazolium (BMIM+) cation to 1butyl-2,3-dimethyl-imidazolium (BMMI+), namely, C2-methylation. Upon C2-methylation, the smeared charge distribution and steric hinderance of the methyl group make BMMI+ reduce the amount of high-coordinated Li+ and depress the formation of Li+-containing agglomerates (AGGs), while the presence of the H2-atom makes BMIM+ stabilize the high coordination of Li+ and enhances the formation of AGGs. Consequently, more non-AGG Li+ ions exist in the SILE consisting of BMMI+, which results in a desired change of the transference number of Li+ and demonstrates that a tiny difference in ionic structure can exert promising effect on the transport properties of SILEs. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据