4.7 Article

Sustained release properties of liquid crystal functionalized poly (amino acid)s nanoparticles

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
卷 369, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2022.120891

关键词

Poly(amino acid)s; Nanoparticles; Drug release; Liquid crystal; Self-assembly

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amphiphilic poly (amino acid)s materials were designed to prepare drug-loaded nanoparticles, which can reduce the adverse effects of antitumor drugs and have good biosafety. The introduction of cholesterol makes the material exhibit liquid crystal properties, facilitating the self-assembly of macro-molecules. Different morphologies, such as spheres or rods, were observed in different environments. The synthesized material showed low toxicity to normal cells and significant targeting and proliferation inhibition of cancer cells. The nanoparticles entered cells slowly through endocytosis and interacted with lysosomes to release drugs. In vitro drug release experiments demonstrated temperature/pH dual responsiveness of the nanoparticles.
Drug-loaded nanoparticles can lower the adverse effects of antitumor drugs and have good biosafety. Herein, a series of amphiphilic poly (amino acid)s materials were designed to prepare drug-loaded nanoparticles by physical encapsulation and chemical bonding. The introduction of cholesterol makes the material show the properties of liquid crystal, and facilitates the regular arrangement of macro-molecules so that it can be well self-assembled. The morphologies with different shapes in different envi-ronments such as spheres or rod were observed. CCK-8 experiment proved the synthesized material was low-toxic to normal cells, and had significant targeting and proliferation inhibition of cancer cells. Nanoparticles entered cells slowly through endocytosis and interact with lysosomes to release drugs. Drug release in vitro shows that the nanoparticles have temperature/pH dual responsiveness.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据