4.7 Article

Structure-Based Discovery of Selective Histone Deacetylase 8 Degraders with Potent Anticancer Activity

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00739

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32090030, 81720108027, 81530074, 21672215]
  2. Shenzhen Municipal Commission of Science and Technology Innovation [JCYJ20190808113405489, JCYJ20170818092450901, JCYJ20200109114214463]
  3. National Key Ramp
  4. D Program of China [2017YFA0503900]
  5. SZU TOP Ranking Project [86000000210]
  6. Key Laboratory of Functional Molecular Solids, Ministry of Education, Anhui Normal University [FMS201912]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study has successfully developed a potent HDAC8 degrader, SZUH280, which induces HDAC8 protein degradation at low micromolar concentrations, inhibits cancer cell growth, and may lead to the development of a new class of cancer therapeutics.
Inducing protein degradation by proteolysis targeting chimeras has gained tremendous momentum as a promising novel therapeutic strategy. Here, we report the design, synthesis, and biological characterization of highly potent proteolysis targeting chimeric small molecules targeting the epigenetic regulator histone deacetylase 8 (HDAC8). We developed potent and effective HDAC8 degraders, as exemplified by SZUH280 (16e), which effectively induced HDAC8 protein degradation and inhibited cancer cell growth even at low micromolar concentrations. Our preliminary mechanistic studies revealed that SZUH280 hampers DNA damage repair in cancer cells, promoting cellular radiosensitization. In mice, a single SZUH280 dose induced rapid and prolonged HDAC8 protein degradation in xenograft tumor tissues. Moreover, SZUH280 alone or in combination with irradiation resulted in long-lasting tumor regression in an A549 tumor mouse model. Our findings qualify a new chemical tool for HDAC8 knockdown and may lead to the development of a new class of cancer therapeutics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据