4.7 Article

High incidence of the virus among respiratory pathogens in children with lower respiratory tract infection in northwestern China

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
卷 95, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.28367

关键词

children; infection analysis; lower respiratory tract infection; respiratory pathogens

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lower respiratory tract infection is a major cause of childhood mortality and viral infection is the main pathogen. Human rhinovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, and parainfluenza virus type 3 are the most frequently identified pathogens. Coinfection of virus and bacteria can lead to more severe pneumonia.
Lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) is one of the major reasons for childhood mortality that threaten the health of the public. We aimed to investigate the epidemiological pathogens and their infection analysis among children with LRTI. Sputum specimens were collected for polymerase chain reaction detection and microbiological tests to identify the viral infection and bacterial infection. The serological specimens were separated from venous blood using for Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae detection. The virus was confirmed in 86.2% of the children. Human rhinovirus (38.3%), respiratory syncytial virus (32.1%), and parainfluenza virus type 3 (27.2%) were the most frequently identified pathogens. Patients with viral and bacterial coinfection showed younger age (p = 0.032), a higher proportion of wheezing rales (p = 0.032), three depressions sign (p = 0.028), and tachypnea (p = 0.038), and more likely associated with severe pneumonia (p = 0.035). Additionally, older children were more susceptible to viral-atypical bacterial coinfection (p = 0.032). Vomiting (p = 0.011) and fever (p = 0.003) were more likely to occur in children with viral-atypical bacterial coinfection. Attention should be paid to the virus infection of LRTI, as viral-bacterial coinfection and viral-atypical bacterial co-infection may have a detrimental impact on the gravity of LTRI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据