4.7 Article

Making Sense of Theories, Models, and Frameworks in Digital Health Behavior Change Design: Qualitative Descriptive Study

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Editorial Material Psychology, Clinical

Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher

Virginia Braun et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRANSGENDER HEALTH (2023)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Identifying candidate quality indicators of tools that support the practice of knowledge translation: a scoping review protocol

Aunima R. Bhuiya et al.

Summary: The objective of this scoping review is to identify and characterize relevant knowledge translation methods tools and uncover quality indicators to inform a future quality assessment tool. Knowledge translation strategies have been rapidly increasing, but there is limited evidence-based guidance or measures to help assess their overall quality.

JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS (2023)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Integrating Behavioral Science and Design Thinking to Develop Mobile Health Interventions: Systematic Scoping Review

Paula Voorheis et al.

Summary: This scoping review explores how insights from Behavioral Design (BD) and Design Thinking (DT) can be integrated into the design process of mobile health (mHealth) interventions. The study finds that BD and DT can be integrated through a process called Behavioral Design Thinking, which involves steps such as empathizing with users, defining user requirements, ideating user-centered features, prototyping solutions, and testing against user needs. Key challenges in mHealth design include engaging patients and the public, incorporating behavior change techniques, and integrating interventions into clinical systems.

JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH (2022)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Conceptual and Design Thinking for Thematic Analysis

Virginia Braun et al.

Summary: This study discusses the application of thematic analysis (TA) in psychology and the need for researchers to choose different methods within TA that may vary in conceptualization and design considerations. The lack of understanding and acknowledgment of this diversity often results in research lacking coherence. The authors provide guidance on conceptual and design thinking for TA, particularly for their own reflexive approach, to support researchers in conducting methodologically sound TA research.

QUALITATIVE PSYCHOLOGY (2022)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Behavior science in the evolving world of digital health: considerations on anticipated opportunities and challenges

Madalina Sucala et al.

Summary: Digital health offers potential to improve intervention effectiveness and reach, presenting a unique opportunity for behavioral scientists. The majority of surveyed scientists are already involved in digital health projects, with an increasing number planning to participate in the future. Stakeholders interviewed anticipate changes in the digital health landscape, including stronger oversight and regulations.

TRANSLATIONAL BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE (2021)

Article Computer Science, Information Systems

Guidance for publishing qualitative research in informatics

Jessica S. Ancker et al.

Summary: This article emphasizes the importance of reporting important components of qualitative research, including theory, research question, sampling, data collection methods, data analysis, results, and discussion. This helps in assessing the rigor of the work and its contribution.

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION (2021)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Back to the Future: Achieving Health Equity Through Health Informatics and Digital Health

LaPrincess C. Brewer et al.

JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH (2020)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Digital Health Behavior Change Technology: Bibliometric and Scoping Review of Two Decades of Research

Fawad Taj et al.

JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH (2019)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Digital health: a path to validation

Simon C. Mathews et al.

NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE (2019)

Article Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary

Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm and Its Implications for Social Work Research

Vibha Kaushik et al.

SOCIAL SCIENCES-BASEL (2019)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

The Impact of mHealth Interventions: Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews

Milena Soriano Marcolino et al.

JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH (2018)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Beyond implementation: digital health innovation and service design

James Shaw et al.

NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE (2018)

Article Nursing

Employing a Qualitative Description Approach in Health Care Research

Carmel Bradshaw et al.

GLOBAL QUALITATIVE NURSING RESEARCH (2017)

Article Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary

Using conceptual depth criteria: addressing the challenge of reaching saturation in qualitative research

James Nelson

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH (2017)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Evaluating Digital Health Interventions Key Questions and Approaches

Elizabeth Murray et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2016)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Understanding and Promoting Effective Engagement With Digital Behavior Change Interventions

Lucy Yardley et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2016)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks

Per Nilsen

IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE (2015)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

The Utility of Template Analysis in Qualitative Psychology Research

Joanna Brooks et al.

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY (2015)

Article Computer Science, Information Systems

Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research

Goran Goldkuhl

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS (2012)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research

James Cane et al.

IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE (2012)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups

Allison Tong et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE (2007)