4.6 Article

Optical properties of yellow-emitting Sr3LaNb3O12:Dy3+ phosphors with an abnormal thermal quenching for white light-emitting diode applications

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10854-022-09374-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. Undergraduate Innovation Fund of Northwest A&F University, China [202210712058, 202210712050, S202210712394, 202110712190, 202110712188, S202110712707, S202010712314, S202010712006]
  2. Scientific and Technological Plan of Guangdong Province, China [2019B090905005]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11804265]
  4. Home for researchers, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of Sr3LaNb3O12 phosphors doped with Dy3+ ions were prepared and characterized in this study, showing promising photoluminescence properties under 352 nm excitation. The optimal Dy3+-doped concentration was found to be 0.05 mol, and the prepared white LED exhibited a low color temperature and high color rendering index, demonstrating the feasibility of Sr3LaNb3O12:Dy3+ luminescent material for LED applications.
In this study, a series of Sr3LaNb3O12 phosphors doped with Dy3+ ions was prepared by a high-temperature solid-state reaction. The crystal structure, phase purity, particle morphology, photoluminescence (PL) properties, and thermal stability of the phosphors were described. And the Sr3LaNb3O12 crystal symmetry is hexagonal. Under the optimal excitation wavelength of 352 nm, the three prominent emission peaks of the Sr3LaNb3O12:Dy3+ focused on 483 nm (F-4(9/2)-H-6(15/2)), 575 nm (F-4(9/2)-H-6(13/2)), and 668 nm (F-4(9/2)-H-6(11/2)). The optimal Dy3+-doped concentration in the Sr3LaNb3O12 phosphor was 0.05 mol. The phosphor had an abnormal thermal quenching phenomenon and activation energy (E-a = 0.29 eV). The prepared white light-emitting diode (w-LED) had a low correlation color temperature of 4162 K, chromaticity coordinates (0.365, 0.368), and the color rendering index 91. The feasibility of the Sr3LaNb3O12:Dy3+ luminescent material for w-LED was verified by its performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据