4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Echocardiographic predictors of poor prognosis in congenital diaphragmatic hernia

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY
卷 51, 期 12, 页码 1926-1930

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.09.014

关键词

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia; Echocardiography; Persistent pulmonary hypertension; Left heart hypoplasia

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan (Health and Labor Sciences Research Grants for Research on Intractable Diseases)
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K15534, 26293252] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate echocardiographic parameters in relation to the outcomes of isolated left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, observational study was conducted among patients with CDH born between 2006 and 2010. Patients in this study did not have severe cardiac malformations or chromosomal aberrations. Patients with incomplete echocardiographic examinations were excluded. In total, 84 patients with left-sided isolated CDH were included in this study. The prognostic parameters were obtained from postnatal echocardiographic images within 24 h after birth. Results: Eight patients died before 90 days of birth. Univariate analysis showed that the presence of continuous right to left shunt at the ductus, left pulmonary artery diameter of <2.7 mm, right pulmonary artery diameter of <3.3 mm, and left ventricular diastolic diameter of <10.8 mm, were the predictors of poor prognosis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that right pulmonary artery diameter of <3.3 mm (adjusted OR 10.28, 95% C.I.: 1.15-249.19) and left ventricular diastolic diameter of <10.8 mm (adjusted OR 7.86, 95% C.I.: 1.01-82.82) were predictors of poor prognosis. Conclusions: This study revealed that the predictors of poor prognosis associated with CDH include smaller right pulmonary artery and left ventricular diastolic diameters. Retrospective Study-Level II. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据