4.1 Article

AC Conductivity of Gamma Irradiated LDPE/ZIF-8 Composite

期刊

JOURNAL OF MACROMOLECULAR SCIENCE PART B-PHYSICS
卷 61, 期 10-11, 页码 1261-1269

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00222348.2022.2159697

关键词

Composite; dielectric properties; gamma radiation; LDPE; ZIF-8

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia
  2. Ministry of Scientific and Technological Development, Higher Education and Information Society of the Republic of Srpska
  3. National Research Foundation, South Africa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article investigates the changing dielectric properties of a LDPE/ZIF-8 composite under gamma radiation. The study found that the conductivity of the samples increased linearly with increasing radiation dose, while the change in dielectric permittivity showed nonlinear behavior.
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are a class of materials that are increasingly used for the detection and separation of gases. This article presents the influence of gamma radiation on the dielectric properties of a LDPE/ZIF-8 composite that can be used for the production of gas sensors and massive gas absorbers. A low-density polyethylene (LDPE)-microsized zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8) composite, obtained by melt mixing (95/5 weight ratio), was gamma-irradiated at room temperature to different absorbed doses up to 300 kGy. Infrared spectroscopy and optical microscopy confirmed the degradation of the ZIF-8 due to the gamma irradiation. The AC conductivity (admittance) of the samples was studied in the frequency range of 24 Hz - 120 kHz and a temperature range 200-350 K. The composite showed larger admittance components relative to the admittance components of pure LDPE; the conductance of the samples increased almost linearly with increasing irradiation dose. On the other hand, the change in dielectric permittivity of the LDPE and the composite due to irradiation was weak and showed nonlinear behavior with increasing radiation dose.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据