4.5 Article

Particle agglomeration behavior in fluidized bed during direct reduction of iron oxide by CO/H2 mixtures

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s42243-022-00882-5

关键词

Direct reduction; Computational fluid dynamics; Discrete element method; Particle agglomeration; CO; H-2 mixture; Micro morphology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The agglomeration behavior of particles is crucial for defluidization in a fluidized bed during the direct reduction process. The influence of CO/H-2 ratio on surface diffusion of iron atoms and the quantification analysis of solid bridge force between iron oxide particles were proposed. Furthermore, the solid bridge force was successfully incorporated into a CFD-DEM model to investigate the detailed information of agglomeration in a fluidized bed. The results show that the region of defluidization is sensitive to reduction temperature, and iron oxide powder exhibits higher metallization and stable fluidization properties at molar fraction of H-2 in the range of 0.6-0.8 when reduced by CO/H-2 mixture.
The agglomeration behavior of particles significantly impacts on the defluidization occurring in a fluidized bed during the direct reduction process. The influence of CO/H-2 ratio on surface diffusion of iron atoms was proposed, and the solid bridge force between iron oxide particles was quantificationally analyzed. Moreover, the solid bridge force was successfully added into a CFD-DEM (computational fluid dynamics-discrete element method) model combined with heat transfer and mass transport to investigate the detailed information of agglomeration in a fluidized bed, including the spatial distribution of temperature, velocity and metallization of iron oxide particles. The region of defluidization is sensitive to the reduction temperature. At the same reduction temperature, the iron oxide powder will perform higher metallization and stable fluidization properties with molar fraction of H-2 in the range of 0.6-0.8, when iron oxide is reduced by CO/H-2 mixture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据