4.3 Article

Distinct clinicopathological features of ovarian endometriosis after long-term exposure to mifepristone

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/03000605221134471

关键词

Endometrium; endometriosis; histopathology; mifepristone; progesterone receptor modulator; adenomyosis; endometrioid borderline tumor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effects of long-term mifepristone on ovarian endometriosis. The results showed that mifepristone can induce ovarian endometriosis that mimics an endometrioid borderline tumor.
ObjectiveMifepristone has been used to treat endometriosis, but it can cause a constellation of endometrial alterations. Our study investigated the effects of long-term mifepristone on ovarian endometriosis. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological changes of ovarian endometriosis in 11 Chinese patients after long-term low-dose mifepristone therapy and compared these alterations with those observed in eutopic endometrium and adenomyosis side-by-side. Immunohistochemistry was applied to investigate estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and Ki67 expression in eutopic and ectopic endometrium. ResultsNearly all patients had a pelvic mass and elevated serum CA125 levels. The ovarian lesions were grossly solid, cystic-solid, or cystic. They had a grayish-reddish appearance and a fleshy, honeycomb-like cut surface. The ovarian lesions shared morphological features with the uterine endometrium, and they were characterized by dilated, crowding endometrial glands with non-physiological changes. Immunostaining revealed consistent staining for ER and PR and a low Ki67 index in both eutopic and ectopic endometrium. ConclusionsOur findings suggest that ovarian endometriosis can mimic an endometrioid borderline tumor after long-term mifepristone administration. Careful histological assessment and related clinical information are critical for the correct interpretation of these rare entities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据