4.3 Article

Electro-purification studies and first measurement of relative permittivity of TMBi

期刊

JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION
卷 17, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/17/12/P12021

关键词

Counting-gas and liquid purification; Gamma detectors (scintillators; CZT; HPGe; HgI etc); Liquid detectors

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  2. French national research agency (ANR)
  3. [WE 1843/8-1]
  4. [SCHA 1447/3-1]
  5. [ANR-18-CE92-0012-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a new type of PET detector using TriMethyl Bismuth (TMBi) as target material is proposed. The experimental setup aims to remove impurities and characterize the properties of TMBi for its application as a detector medium. This study demonstrates the potential of TMBi in PET applications but also highlights the challenges to be addressed.
A new type of detector for positron-emission tomography (PET) has been proposed recently, using a heavy organo-metallic liquid - TriMethyl Bismuth (TMBi) - as target material. TMBi is a transparent liquid with the high Z element Bismuth contributing 82% of its mass. 511 keV annihilation photons are converted efficiently into photo-electrons within the detector material producing both Cherenkov light and free charge carriers in the liquid. While the optical component enables a fast timing, a charge readout using a segmented anode can provide an accurate position reconstruction and energy determination. The charge measurement requires a high level of purification, as any electronegative contaminants cause signal degradation. In addition to the purity requirements, the reactive nature of TMBi poses many challenges that need to be met until a fully functioning detector for PET applications can be realized. The paper presents an experimental setup that aims to remove electronegative impurities by electrostatic filtering and to characterise the properties of TMBi, e.g. the relative permittivity, for its application as a detector medium for charge read out.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据