4.4 Article

Transforming metadata content guidelines and instructions to linked data

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/01655515221142428

关键词

Data content standards; Dublin Core; linked data; metadata guidelines and instructions; RDA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the transformation of data content standards to linked data through conversion from other formats, based on a proposed layered framework. Several main issues were examined under the basic policies for making linked data: assigning URIs to units, defining relationships among instructions with URIs, and expressing instructed content properly using RDF properties. By making proper choices for each issue, actual standards such as RDA and Dublin Core User Guide were successfully converted to linked data. The results demonstrate the validity and usefulness of this approach in utilizing linked data.
Among metadata-related standards, data content standards like metadata guidelines and instructions for creating metadata still remain in legacy forms. This study investigates a way to transform data content standards to linked data (LD) through conversion from other formats, while referring to the proposed layered framework. Under the basic policies for making LD on which this study is based, several principal matters were examined: (a) defining units to be assigned with Universal Resource Identifiers (URIs), (b) defining relationships among the instructions with URIs and (c) expressing instructed content in instructions properly with certain Resource Description Framework (RDF) properties. With the proper choice(s) for each matter, some actual standards were converted to LD: Resource Description and Access (RDA) and Dublin Core User Guide. The results showed that the adopted way of transforming data content standards to LD is valid and proper, and the resultant LD would be expected to be utilised in various manners.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据