4.4 Article

An Analytical Treatment of the Hysteretic Storage-Discharge Relation

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING
卷 28, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002233

关键词

Author key Storage-discharge (S-Q) relation; Rectangular plane section; Hysteresis; Loop; Kinematic wave; Infiltration rate; Rainfall intensity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzes the storage-discharge (S-Q) relationship in hydrology using a kinematic wave approximation model for a plane watershed, considering the effects of rainfall, infiltration, and surface runoff. Depending on the duration of rainfall, two cases – equilibrium and partial equilibrium – are distinguished, and the hysteresis behavior of the S-Q relationship is carefully examined.
The storage-discharge (S-Q) relation, widely employed in hydrology and hydraulics, is often derived from empirical data and is found to be hysteretic or looped, although approximated by a straight line or a curve in hydrologic modeling. The nature of hysteresis depends on geometric and hydraulic conditions. Despite its ubiquitous use, an analytical treatment discussing what causes the storage-discharge relationship to exhibit a looped behavior does not seem to have been reported. This study analyzes the S-Q relation analytically using kinematic wave approximation for a watershed represented by a plane, considering simultaneously rainfall, infiltration, and surface runoff or overland flow. For purposes of simplicity and tractability of analytical solutions, both rainfall intensity and infiltration rate are assumed to be constant. Depending on the duration of rainfall, two cases-equilibrium and partial equilibrium-are distinguished. The hysteretic S-Q relationship is different for these two cases and requires close scrutiny, which is pursued in this study. It is emphasized that the assumptions of constant rainfall intensity and infiltration rate, rectangular geometry, and kinematic wave approximation undermine the dynamics of hysteresis. (C) 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据