4.5 Article

Erenumab versus topiramate: post hoc efficacy analysis from the HER-MES study

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s10194-022-01511-y

关键词

Erenumab; Topiramate; Calcitonin gene-related peptide; Preventive; Migraine; Efficacy; Standard of care

资金

  1. Novartis Pharma GmbH, Nuremberg, Germany

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The HER-MES trial was the first head-to-head study comparing erenumab to topiramate, and the results demonstrated that erenumab had better tolerability and efficacy in treating migraines.
Objective: HER-MES was the first head-to-head, phase 4 trial to assess the tolerability and effectiveness of erenumab against standard of care treatment (topiramate). This post hoc analysis compared the efficacy of erenumab with topiramate in patients who completed the trial on study medication. Methods: Post hoc sensitivity analysis was performed using the full analysis set. Outcomes assessed included the proportion of patients with a >= 50% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) from baseline (50% responder rate), over the last 3 months (months 4, 5, and 6) of the double-blind treatment phase (DBTP), the 50% responder rate during the first month of the DBTP, and change from baseline in MMD during the DBTP. Multiple imputation was done for efficacy values of patients who discontinued study treatment. Results: Patients (N = 777) were randomly assigned (1:1) to either 70 or 140 mg/month erenumab (N = 389) or 50-100 mg/day topiramate (N = 388). Of these, 334 patients (85.9%) receiving erenumab, and 231 patients (59.5%) receiving topiramate completed the DBTP on study medication. Patients on study medication until the end of the DBTP received a mean dose of 119 mg/month for erenumab and 92 mg/day for topiramate. At month 1, a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving erenumab (39.2%) reported >= 50% reduction in MMD from baseline compared with those receiving topiramate (24.0%; p < 0.001). In the last 3 months, a significantly larger proportion of patients receiving erenumab (60.3%) achieved >= 50% reduction in MMD from baseline compared with those receiving topiramate (43.3%; p < 0.001). Patients receiving erenumab demonstrated significantly greater reductions in MMD during the last 3 months from baseline versus those receiving topiramate (- 6.13 vs - 4.90; 95% CI: - 1.87 to - 0.61; p < 0.001). Conclusions: This post hoc analysis demonstrated significantly superior efficacy of erenumab versus topiramate in achieving a >= 50% reduction in MMD with an early onset of efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据