4.7 Article

Sustainable decontamination of heavy metal in wastewater and soil with novel rectangular wave asymmetrical alternative current electrochemistry

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 442, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130021

关键词

Sustainable remediation; Soil washing effluent; Alternating current electrochemistry; Removal and recovery; Regeneration and recycling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new approach combining asymmetrical alternative current electrochemistry and functionalized electrodes has been developed to remediate heavy metal contaminated soil and simultaneously recover and reuse EDTA.
A new concept of removal and recovery of heavy metals and simultaneous regeneration and reuse of ethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid (EDTA) in soil washing effluent containing metal-EDTA complexes is proposed, which is used to remediate heavy metal contaminated soil. To achieve this goal, soil washing approach coupled with rectangular wave asymmetrical alternative current electrochemistry (RW-ACE) equipped with amidoxime-functionalized electrodes (Ami-CF) is employed. With high hydrophilicity and strong binding affinity, Ami-CF could specifically compete for heavy metals over EDTA under electric field. RW-ACE system is found success-fully to achieve the non-destructive decomplexation of heavy metal-EDTA, and then regenerate EDTA for highly recycling, which saves as high as 98.9 % EDTA consumption compared with conventional washing method. Moreover, more than 90% of heavy metals are recovered and deposited on the electrode with a majority of them existed as zero-valence state as evidenced by XPS. The RW-ACE method is universal for various heavy metals such as Cu2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, and Pb2+ in an authentic contaminated soil, and the loss of soil nutrient is very limited. Along with long-term assessment and operation cost estimation, the RW-ACE method is a sustainable remedi-ation approach for the heavy metal polluted wastewater and soils, and easily scaled up for field practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据