4.7 Article

Fe-N-C single-atom nanozyme for ultrasensitive, on-site and multiplex detection of mycotoxins using lateral flow immunoassay

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 441, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129853

关键词

Single-atom nanozymes; Lateral flow immunoassay; Hydroxyl radicals; Catalytic mechanism; Mycotoxins

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sensitive and portable detection of mycotoxins using Fe-N-C single-atom nanozymes was successfully achieved. The method allowed qualitative and quantitative detection with low cost and high sensitivity, and could be observed with naked eyes or a smartphone.
Sensitive, on-site and multiple detection of mycotoxins is a vital early-warning tool to minimize food losses and protect human health and the environment. Although paper-based lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) has been extensively applied in mycotoxins monitoring, low-cost, portable, ultrasensitive and quantitative detection is still a formidable challenge. Herein, a series of Fe-N-C single-atom nanozymes (SAzymes) were synthesized and systematic characterized. The optimal Fe-N-C SAzyme with highly efficient catalytic performance was success-fully used as both label and catalyst in lateral flow immunoassays for mycotoxin detection. By taking advantage of the catalytic amplified system, the qualitative and quantitative detection can be easily and flexibly done via observing the test lines by naked eyes or a smartphone, with the limit of detections (LODs) of 2.8 and 13.9 pg mL(-1) for AFB(1) and FB1, which were respectively over 700-and 71,000-fold lower than the maximum limit set by the European Union. Besides, underlying catalytic mechanisms and the active sites of the Fe-N-C SAzyme are also investigated by DFT simulation. This work not only provides a promising detection strategy for the application of advanced SAzymes but also offers experimental and theoretical guidelines to understand the active centers of Fe -N-C SAzymes and the catalytic process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据