4.4 Article

Complete genome and pathogenesis of a novel recombinant Senecavirus A isolate in PR China

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENERAL VIROLOGY
卷 103, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/jgv.0.001788

关键词

Senecavirus A; full-length genome; pigs; pathogenesis; transmission

资金

  1. National Key RD Program [2016YFD0500708]
  2. Major Scientific and Technological Innovation Project (MSTIP) [2019JZZY010720]
  3. Shandong Province Pig Industry Technology System [SDAIT276 08-06]
  4. Shandong Province Agricultural Applications of Major Innovation Projects [SD2019XM003, SD2019XM006]
  5. Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Project of Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences [CXGC2018E10, 279 CXGC2021B03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A strain of SVA was isolated from a pig herd in Shandong Province, China and shown to successfully infect pigs and induce robust immune responses. The virus was also capable of transmission to other pigs.
Senecavirus A (SVA), formerly called Seneca Valley virus (SVV) was first isolated from the USA in 2002. This study isolated an SVA strain from a pig herd in Shandong Province, PR China and designated it SVA-CH-SDGT-2017. The full-length genome, excluding the poly(A) tails of the SVA isolates, was 7280 nucleotides long, with the genomic organization resembling and sharing high nucleotide identities of 90.7-96.9 % with other previously reported SVA isolates. To investigate the pathogenicity of the SVA isolates, experimental infections of pigs were performed. The SVA strains successfully infected the pigs, as evidenced by the presence of virus shedding and robust serum neutralizing antibody responses. In addition, the contact-exposed experiment showed that the virus shedding of the contact-exposed pigs was approximately a 100-fold reduced compared to that of the inoculated group, indicating that the virus is capable of transmission to pigs. Our findings provide useful data for studying the pathogenesis and transmission of SVA in pigs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据