4.5 Article

Ulcer Scarring in the Gastric Conduit Is a Risk Factor for Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY
卷 27, 期 2, 页码 250-261

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05545-0

关键词

Esophagectomy; Anastomotic leakage; Ulcer scarring; ICG fluorescence imaging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to identify risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL) after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. The results showed that peptic or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) ulcer scars were independently associated with AL, in addition to diabetes mellitus. The scars in the anterior/posterior gastric wall were more frequent in patients with AL, and the gastric conduit with scars had significantly lower flow velocity evaluated by indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging. Therefore, preventive interventions and careful postoperative management should be provided to minimize the risk and severity of AL in patients with these risk factors.
Background Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a serious complication after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. The objective of this study was to identify the risk factors for AL. Methods Patients with esophageal cancer who underwent curative esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastric anastomosis between 2009 and 2019 (N= 346) and those between 2020 and 2022 (N= 17) were enrolled in the study to identify the risk factors for AL and the study to assess the association between the risk factors and blood flow in the gastric conduit evaluated by indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging, respectively. Results AL occurred in 17 out of 346 patients (4.9%). Peptic or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) ulcer scars were independently associated with AL (OR 6.872, 95% CI 2.112-22.365) in addition to diabetes mellitus. The ulcer scars in the anterior/posterior gastric wall were more frequently observed in patients with AL than in those without AL (75.0% vs. 17.4%, P = 0.042). The median flow velocity of ICG fluorescence in the gastric conduits with the scars was significantly lower than in those without the scars (1.17 cm/s vs. 2.23 cm/s, P = 0.004). Conclusions Peptic or ESD ulcer scarring is a risk factor for AL after esophagectomy in addition to diabetes mellitus. The scars in the anterior/posterior gastric wall are significantly associated with AL, impairing blood flow of the gastric conduit. Preventive interventions and careful postoperative management should be provided to minimize the risk and severity of AL in patients with these risk factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据