4.6 Article

Broadband acoustic resonance dissolution spectroscopy of natural edible salts: Visualization and interpretation for descriptive and diagnostic analysis

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104722

关键词

Acoustics; BARDS; Composition; Morphology; Salt; T -distributed stochastic neighbor embedding

资金

  1. Isfahan University of Technology (IUT), Isfahan, Iran
  2. Wageningen University & Research (WUR), The Netherlands

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed Iranian natural salts using the BARDS method and investigated the compositions and crystalline structures of the samples. By visualizing the salt types using nonlinear dimensionality reduction methods, the potential of BARDS in characterizing natural edible salts was demonstrated.
Broadband acoustic resonance dissolution spectroscopy (BARDS) has been recently introduced as a low-cost method for the analysis of powdered materials. In this study, ten Iranian natural table salts, each separated into five particle size fractions, were analyzed with BARDS. The compositions and crystalline structure of samples were investigated with inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy, flame photometry, and X-ray diffraction methods. Moreover, different linear and nonlinear dimensionality reduction methods were used to visualize the ten salt types. The analyses revealed the presence of halite, sylvite, and anhydrite in the rock salts, and halite, bischofite, and periclase in the sea salts. Subjecting bubble volume spectra to nonlinear dimensionality reduction using the t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding algorithm, the salts were clearly distinguished in a two-dimensional space with the distances and positions relative to their composition, crystalline structure, and particle morphology. The results of this study provide a roadmap toward unraveling the underlying mechanisms behind the BARDS spectra for further applications in characterizing natural edible salts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据