4.6 Article

Radioactive isotopes 40K, 137Cs, 226Ra, 228Ra, 234Th in algae supplements-Potential radiotoxicity of aquatic superfoods

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104862

关键词

Food analysis; Radiotoxicity; Radioactive contamination; Diet supplement; Superfood; Effective radiation dose

资金

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences [2020VBB0008]
  2. Ministry of Education and Science [DS/531-T030-D841-22]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the levels of radioactive nuclides in algae supplements worldwide and estimated the effective radiation doses from consuming these supplements. The findings suggest that the activity concentrations of radionuclides in algae supplements are low and the supplements can be considered safe for consumption.
Many food products are recommended to give health benefits. Thus algae superfoods consumption is growing worldwide, although quite a few studies have examined the quantities of radionuclides they contain and their potential effects on human health. The study presents radioactive K-40, Cs-137, Ra-226, Ra-228, and Th-234 in algae supplements available worldwide for human consumption. Samples have been quantified by gamma-ray spectrometry and the activity concentrations (Bq/kg dw) ranged 0.23-0.65 (Cs-137) followed by 1.76-10.7 (Ra-226), 0.20-12.7 (Ra-228), 11.6-24.2 (Th-234), and 20.1-400 (K-40). Also, the effective radiation doses from K-40, Cs-137, Ra-226,Ra- 228, and Th-234 decay ingested with analyzed algae supplements have been estimated. The highest annual effective dose reaching 15.1 mu Sv/year has been assessed for naturally occurring Ra-226 in Chlorella vulgaris from Japan. The Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant has not significantly impacted the effective dose from Cs-137 present in algal superfoods. Based on the study, the activity concentrations of radionuclides seem to be low, the naturally occurring radionuclides would give the highest effective doses, and the investigated algae supplements could be considered safe food.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据