4.6 Article

Simultaneous detection and quantification of two European anglerfishes by novel genomic primer

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104992

关键词

Anglerfish; Adulteration; Fish identification; Food frauds; Genetic marker; Lophius; Parvalbumin; PCR sequencing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Globalisation has led to increased trade and consumption of fish, increasing the likelihood of fish adulteration. Researchers have developed a real-time PCR assay that can simultaneously detect and quantify European anglerfish and black-bellied anglerfish, serving as a potential tool in preventing illegal species substitutions and food fraud.
Globalisation has led to increased trade and consumption of fish worldwide. As international trade and con-sumption of fish increases, so does the likelihood of fish being adulterated. It is often an illegal exchange of species where a cheaper species is substituted for a more expensive and rarer one. In Europe, the anglerfish (Lophius piscatorius) is often traded as the rarer, more popular black-bellied anglerfish (Lophius budegassa). To improve our ability to monitor and detect adulterants in these fish species, we developed a real-time PCR assay that allows for the simultaneous detection and quantification of L. piscatorius and L. budegassa. The newly designed primers target the second intron of the genomic gene parvalbumin. The proposed methodology shows good robustness, efficiency and high specificity. Of the 47 species tested, only Lophius species were amplified. Their differentiation is possible by analysing melting curves with an average Tm of 70.1 degrees C for L. piscatorius and 75.3 degrees C for L. budegassa, respectively. The detection limit for both species was 0.050 ng/mu l. The assay also provides a tool to quantify parvalbumin in European anglerfish. The findings point to the use of the method proposed as a potential tool in forensic investigations to prevent illegal species substitutions, mislabeling, and food fraud.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据