4.5 Article

Contribution of flagellar cap gene in virulence and pathogenicity of Aeromonas veronii

期刊

JOURNAL OF FISH DISEASES
卷 46, 期 3, 页码 247-259

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jfd.13739

关键词

Aeromonas veronii; flagellar cap; pathogenicity; virulence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aeromonas veronii is an important zoonotic and aquatic pathogen. This study found that the mutation of its flagellar cap gene (fliD) led to reduced motility, defective flagellum, and attenuated biofilm formation. In vivo experiments showed that the mutant strain had lower colonization capacity and higher median lethal dose compared to the wild-type strain.
Aeromonas veronii is an important zoonotic and aquatic pathogen that causes a number of illnesses in both humans and animals. It is related to gastroenteritis, skin and soft tissue infections and bacteremia in humans, as well as causing significant economic losses in aquaculture owing to fish sepsis. Here, we constructed the flagellar cap gene (fliD) mutant strain of A. veronii by suicide plasmid-mediated homologous recombination system and analysed its characteristics. It was found that the deletion of fliD had no effect on growth and biochemical properties and could be inherited stably. However, the motility of A. veronii Delta fliD was significantly reduced, the flagellum was defective and the biofilm formation was attenuated compared with that of A. veronii wild-type strain. In vivo experiments revealed that the colonization capacity of Delta fliD was significantly lower than that of the wild-type strain in the period of first 24 h, and the median lethal dose (LD50) was 56 times higher than that of the wild-type strain. The Cyprinus carpio infected with the wild-type strain indicated faster death speed and more severe clinical signs compared to Delta fliD strain. These results suggest that fliD is closely related to the virulence of A. veronii and plays an important role in pathogenicity, providing the foundation for pathogenic mechanism studies of A. veronii.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据