4.2 Article

Reproductive isolation via divergent genital morphology due to cascade reinforcement in Ohomopterus ground beetles

期刊

JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
卷 36, 期 1, 页码 169-182

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.14116

关键词

Carabus maiyasanus; genitalia; lock-and-key; reproductive character displacement; reproductive interference

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Secondary contact and selection against maladaptive hybridization can lead to reinforcement and reproductive character displacement between populations in contact. This can generate downstream reproductive isolation and contribute to speciation.
Secondary contact between incipient species and selection against maladaptive hybridization can drive reinforcement between populations in contact and result in reproductive character displacement (RCD). Resultant divergence in mating traits within a species may generate downstream reproductive isolation between populations with displaced and non-displaced traits, referred to as the cascade reinforcement hypothesis. We examined this hypothesis using three allopatric populations of the ground beetle Carabus maiyasanus with a genital lock-and-key system. This species shows RCD in male and female genital morphologies in populations in contact with the sister species C. iwawakianus. In a reciprocal mating experiment using three allopatric populations with differences in male and female genital sizes, insemination failure increased as the difference in genital size increased. Based on the reproductive isolation index, insemination failure was the major postmating-prezygotic isolation barrier, at least in one population pair with comparable total isolation to those of other species pairs. By contrast, there was only incomplete premating isolation among populations. These results suggest that RCD in genital morphologies drives incipient allopatric speciation, supporting the cascade reinforcement hypothesis. These findings provide insight into the roles of interspecific interactions and subsequent trait diversification in speciation processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据