4.4 Article

Projected network performance for next generation aerosol monitoring systems

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2022.107088

关键词

Nuclear explosion; Nuclear monitoring; CTBT; Next generation samplers; 131I; 140Ba

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By improving the specifications of aerosol monitoring equipment, more samples per day can be collected and analyzed with the same minimum detectable concentrations. The authors simulated hypothetical releases of radioactive isotopes and found that next generation equipment will increase network resilience and improve source-location capability.
Aerosol monitoring for radioactivity is a mature and proven technology. However, by improving key specifications of aerosol monitoring equipment, more samples per day can be collected and analyzed with the same minimum detectable concentrations as current systems. This work models hypothetical releases of 140Ba and 131I over a range of magnitudes corresponding to the inventory produced from the fission of about 100 g to 1 kiloton TNT-equivalent of 235U. The releases occur over an entire year to incorporate the natural variability in atmospheric transport. Sampling equipment located at the 79 locations for radionuclide stations identified in the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) for the International Monitoring System are used to determine the detections of the individual releases. Alternative collection schemes in next generation equipment that collect 2, 3, or 4 samples per day, rather than the current 1 sample per day, would result in detections in many more samples at more stations with detections for a given release level. The authors posit that next generation equipment will result in increased network resilience to outages and improved source-location capability for lower yield source releases. The application of dual-detector and coincidence measurements to these systems would significantly boost sensitivity for some isotopes and would further enhance the monitoring capability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据