4.5 Article

Efficacy of Endoscope and Periapical Radiography to Detect Residual Root Canal Filling Using Micro-CT as Reference

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
卷 49, 期 2, 页码 212-218

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2022.11.014

关键词

Endoscope; microcomputed tomography; residual filling material; root canal retreatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of examinations by endoscope of root canals to determine residual root canal filling materials. The endoscope detected residual root canal filling material as efficiently as periapical radiography.
Introduction: To evaluate the efficacy of examinations by endoscope of root canals to determine residual root canal filling materials by comparison with microcomputed tomographic (micro-CT) images as reference. Methods: Thirty maxillary second premolars with oval canals received root canal treatment. Then D-Race retreatment files were used to remove the root canal fillings supplemented by XP-endo Finisher. Samples were scanned to reconstruct micro-CT reference images. Images were obtained of all samples from the mesiodistal and buccolingual directions by digital radiography. Then the root canals of specimens mounted in manikins were assessed by endoscope. The radiographic and endoscopic results were scored following comparison with the micro-CT images, which served as a reference, by 2 blinded observers. The interexaminer reliability of the assessments was evaluated by kappa test and the accuracy of endoscopic visualization according to the presence of residual root canal filling materials was compared using Kruskal-Wallis H test and Spearman's rank order correlation with the level of significance set at 5%. Results: The efficiency of the periapical radiography and endoscopy to determine residual root canal filling material was similar in every third of the root canal (P . .05). Conclusions: The endoscope detected residual root canal filling material as efficiently as periapical radiography. (J Endod 2023;49:212-218.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据