4.5 Article

Cytotoxic, apoptotic and necrotic effects of starch coated copper nanoparticles on Capan 1 pancreatic cancer cells

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jddst.2022.104077

关键词

Copper nanoparticles; Pancreatic cancer; Biosynthesis; Starch

向作者/读者索取更多资源

“The objective of this study was to prepare stable starch-coated copper nanoparticles (Cu-SNPs) by a green synthesis method and evaluate their apoptotic and necrotic effects on Capan 1 pancreatic cancer cell line. The Cu-SNPs showed antimicrobial effects on Staphylocossus and Enterococcus and exhibited cytotoxic, necrotic, and apoptotic effects on the Capan 1 cell line.”
In the present study we utilized a green synthesis approach by reduction route with ascorbic acid in the presence of starch as the capping agent. Here we aimed to generate a stable starch coating copper nanoparticles (Cu-SNPs) and to investigate their apoptotic and necrotic effects on Capan 1 pancreatic cancer cell line. The water soluble monodisperse starch-protected zero-valent copper nanoparticles were characterized by transmission electron microscopy, XPS, FTIR analysis. TEM images showed that the presence of metallic copper nanoparticles with anisotrophic morphologies and the sizes of 90% copper nanoparticles were in 50 nm and 80 nm range. Cetyl-trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) coated copper nanoparticles was also synthesized to compare the stability of starch coating copper nanoparticles. It was also found that copper nanoparticles were significantly protected by starch coating. Cu-SNPs exhibited stronger antimicrobial effects on Staphylocossus and Enterococcus. In vitro cell culture studies demonstrated that Cu-SNPs were not cytotoxic on L929-fibroblasts and Capan 1 pancreatic cancer cell in all concentrations used here (6.25-100 ppm) in different extends. The cytotoxic, necrotic, and apoptotic effects of Cu-SNPs on the Capan 1 pancreatic cancer cell line have been exhibited. Furthermore, the micronucleus test and hemolytic activity test were also performed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据