4.3 Review

Immune response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination in patients receiving secukinumab: a literature review

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2023.2167487

关键词

COVID-19; immune-mediated inflammatory diseases; SARS-CoV-2 vaccination; secukinumab

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this literature review is to examine the impact of IMID treatments on the immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. The results show that patients receiving secukinumab treatment for IMIDs have an adequate immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, and there is no evidence of impaired immune function.
Purpose: There is a paucity of evidence on the impact of immune-mediated inflammatory disease (IMID) treatments on the immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. The purpose of this literature review is to address the question of whether patients with IMIDs receiving secukinumab, a fully human anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody, have an adequate immune response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Materials and Methods: Clinical studies that evaluated the effect of secukinumab on immune responses in patients with IMIDs after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination were searched in publication databases, including Medline and Embase, until May 2022. Results: From the 53 articles identified, a total of 11 articles were included. Overall, the majority of the patients treated with secukinumab elicited an adequate immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Patients receiving secukinumab for IMIDs developed cellular immune responses following vaccination with the BNT162b2 vaccine, and there were no significant differences in the overall humoral and cellular immune responses between patients and healthy individuals. The third dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine resulted in a positive antibody response in secukinumab-treated patients. Conclusion: The available data provide no evidence of impairment in immunological response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines by secukinumab in patients with IMIDs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据