4.4 Article

Theoretical evidence of piezoelectric constant enhancement of M-doped AlN (M = Sc, Er)

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRYSTAL GROWTH
卷 599, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2022.126889

关键词

B1; AlN; A1; Doping; B2; Piezoelectric constant

资金

  1. Outstanding Young and Middle-aged Science and Technology Innovation Team of Colleges and Universities in Hubei Provence
  2. Outstanding Talent Foundation for Green Industry Leading Plan of HBUT
  3. Science Foun-dation of State Key Laboratory of Structural Chemistry
  4. [T201907]
  5. [JCRC2021003]
  6. [20210028]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The piezoelectric properties of Sc-or Er-doped wurtzite AlN at different dopant concentrations were investigated using first-principles calculations. It was found that Sc0.5Al0.5N and Er0.5Al0.5N exhibited the highest piezoelectric constants at a dopant concentration of 0.5, with values of 25.50 pC/N and 9.34 pC/N, respectively. The enhancement of piezoelectric constant was attributed to the long polarization length and improved ionicity of Al-N bond after doping.
The piezoelectric properties of Sc-or Er-doped wurtzite AlN at different dopant concentrations were investigated using the first-principles calculations by analyzing the lattice distortion and the bonding type. It is found that when x = 0.5, Sc-or Er-doped AlN presents the highest piezoelectric constants in several dopant concentrations, namely, 25.50 pC/N for Sc0.5Al0.5N and 9.34 pC/N for Er0.5Al0.5N. By calculating the coordinate difference between positive and negative charge centers, it is confirmed that the enhancement of piezoelectric constant for M-doped AlN (M = Sc, Er) is related to the long polarization length. Meanwhile, Mulliken population analysis proves that the improved ionicity of Al-N bond after doping is another reason for the enhancement of piezo-electric constant. This work provides a theoretical basis for further improving the piezoelectric properties of AlN and its application in the high-frequency devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据