4.7 Article

Laboratory evaluation of PAH and VOC emission from plastic-modified asphalt

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 377, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134489

关键词

Emissions; Recycled plastics; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Volatile organic compounds; Bitumen; Asphalt

资金

  1. Austroads Ltd.
  2. [APT6305]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recycled plastic modified asphalt is a new topic in the road construction industry. This study investigated the use of four types of recycled plastic in asphalt and found that except for the mixture at 180 degrees Celsius, adding recycled plastic can effectively reduce overall emissions.
Recycled plastic modified asphalt is an emerging topic in the road construction industry that has been studied meticulously from a physical and mechanical perspective. However, the exposure of recycled plastics to high temperatures has been a growing concern due to the possible release of toxic gases associated with burning plastics. This research investigates laboratory-generated fumes from recycled plastic modified asphalt incorporated via two different methods using four types of recycled plastic from post-industrial and post-consumer streams. Results were compared against conventional asphalt prepared using neat bitumen or commercial polymer-modified bitumen. A direct liquid injection method using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GCMS) was employed to quantify 48 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Results revealed that the incorporation of recycled plastics could effectively reduce (up to 34% VOCs and 51% PAHs) overall emissions at all working temperatures except when recycled acrylonitrile butadiene styrene was mixed at 180 degrees C. Further tests involving sorption analysis of plastics revealed that plastics have an adsorbent capability with a selectivity towards PAHs (compared to VOCs) and therefore further justifying that the addition of recycled plastics in asphalt can effectively limit the total emitted compounds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据