4.7 Article

Wind turbine concepts for domestic wind power generation at low wind quality sites

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 394, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136137

关键词

Wind energy; Turbine; Tip speed ratio (TSR); Computational fluid dynamics (CFD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An overview of different wind turbine designs was presented and evaluated for their potential use in micro-wind production under poor wind quality situations. The Savonius turbine and the Savonius-Darrieus Hybrid turbine were found to be the most suitable designs. Computational Fluid Dynamic simulations were conducted with these turbines at various wind speeds, and the power output, power coefficients, and Tip Speed Ratios were determined. The results showed that the Hybrid turbine generated more power than the Savonius turbine for most wind speeds, except for 3 m/s.
An overview of extant wind turbine designs is presented. Each concept is evaluated for potential for micro-wind production under poor wind quality situations, such as those seen in densely populated, suburban, or sparsely forested regions. It was concluded that the Savonius turbine and the Savonius-Darrieus Hybrid turbines were the most suited designs out of the seven that were investigated. In addition, several types of materials for micro-wind turbines were explored. Two-dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) simulations were run with the Savonius, and Savonius-Darrieus hybrid turbines with wind speeds 3 m/s, 5 m/s, 7 m/s and 10 m/s. Power generated by the turbines under each wind speed as well as the power coefficients and Tip Speed Ratios of the turbines were determined, and it was found that the Savonius turbine simulated had the maximum power co-efficient of 0.31 at TSR = 0.97 and the Hybrid turbine had 0.32 at TSR = 2.24. It was also concluded that the Hybrid turbine generates more power than the Savonius turbine for all wind speeds except for 3 m/s. The maximum power output by any turbine simulated in this study was 157 W.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据