4.6 Article

Development and validation of a direct injection liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the analysis of illicit drugs and psychopharmaceuticals in wastewater

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1685, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2022.463562

关键词

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass; spectrometry; Direct injection; Illicit drugs; Psychopharmaceuticals; Wastewater

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A direct injection liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method was developed for analyzing illicit drugs and psychopharmaceuticals in wastewater. The method offers a faster screening alternative without sample pre-concentration techniques, and it revealed incomplete removal of these substances during wastewater treatment.
A direct injection liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method was successfully developed for the analysis of 19 illicit drugs and psychopharmaceuticals in raw and treated wastewater. The method includes the analysis of stimulants and opioids, and antidepressant, antipsychotic, antianxiety, appetite suppressant and hallucinogen drugs. The method limits of quantification range from 5 - 59 ng L -1 and 2 - 38 ng L -1 in raw and treated wastewater, respectively. Analysis of raw and treated wastewater sam-ples collected daily for a week from a wastewater treatment plant operating with oxidation ditch tech-nology showed that codeine and tramadol were the drugs with the highest median mass concentra-tions in raw wastewater (1800 and 1000 ng L -1, respectively). The presence of some of the drugs in treated wastewater samples implies incomplete removal of illicit drugs and psychopharmaceuticals dur-ing wastewater treatment. This method offers an alternative to existing methods for faster screening of wastewater samples without the need for sample pre-concentration techniques, such as solid-phase ex-traction, with limits of detection in the low nanogram per litre range.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据