4.7 Article

Assessing the accuracy of hybrid exchange-correlation functionals for the density response of warm dense electrons

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 158, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0135729

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We evaluate the accuracy of common hybrid exchange-correlation functionals for perturbed electron gas in warm dense matter. Comparing with exact quantum Monte Carlo results, we find that PBE0, PBE0-1/3, HSE06, and HSE03 functionals show improved density response, while B3LYP performs poorly. The PBE0, PBE0-1/3, HSE06, and HSE03 functionals are also more accurate than SCAN in the regime of partial degeneracy.
We assess the accuracy of common hybrid exchange-correlation (XC) functionals (PBE0, PBE0-1/3, HSE06, HSE03, and B3LYP) within the Kohn-Sham density functional theory for the harmonically perturbed electron gas at parameters relevant for the challenging conditions of the warm dense matter. Generated by laser-induced compression and heating in the laboratory, the warm dense matter is a state of matter that also occurs in white dwarfs and planetary interiors. We consider both weak and strong degrees of density inhomogeneity induced by the external field at various wavenumbers. We perform an error analysis by comparing with the exact quantum Monte Carlo results. In the case of a weak perturbation, we report the static linear density response function and the static XC kernel at a metallic density for both the degenerate ground-state limit and for partial degeneracy at the electronic Fermi temperature. Overall, we observe an improvement in the density response when the PBE0, PBE0-1/3, HSE06, and HSE03 functionals are used, compared with the previously reported results for the PBE, PBEsol, local-density approximation, and AM05 functionals; B3LYP, on the other hand, does not perform well for the considered system. Additionally, the PBE0, PBE0-1/3, HSE06, and HSE03 functionals are more accurate for the density response properties than SCAN in the regime of partial degeneracy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据