4.7 Article

Seebeck, Peltier, and Soret effects: On different formalisms for transport equations in thermogalvanic cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 158, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0131731

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thermogalvanic cells can convert waste heat into electricity directly, but they are not fully utilized. This article discusses theoretical tools, such as nonequilibrium thermodynamics, that can help us understand and improve the performance of these cells. It recommends using this theory with operationally defined, independent variables for well-defined experiments.
Thermogalvanic cells convert waste heat directly to electric work. There is an abundance of waste heat in the world and thermogalvanic cells may be underused. We discuss theoretical tools that can help us understand and therefore improve on cell performance. One theory is able to describe all aspects of the energy conversion: nonequilibrium thermodynamics. We recommend to use the theory with operationally defined, independent variables, as others have done before. These describe well-defined experiments. Three invariance criteria serve as a basis for any description: of local electroneutrality, entropy production invariance, and emf's independence of the frame of reference. Alternative formalisms, using different sets of variables, start with ionic or neutral components. We show that the heat flux is not the same in the two formalisms and derive a new relationship between the heat fluxes. The heat flux enters the definition of the Peltier coefficient and is essential for the understanding of the Peltier heat at the electrode interfaces and of the Seebeck coefficient of the cell. The Soret effect can occur independently of any Seebeck effect, but the Seebeck effect will be affected by the presence of a Soret effect. Common misunderstandings are pointed out. Peltier coefficients are needed for the interpretation and design of experiments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据