4.7 Article

A probabilistic microkinetic modeling framework for catalytic surface reactions

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 158, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0132877

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We introduce a probabilistic microkinetic modeling (MKM) framework that integrates the short-ranged order (SRO) evolution of adsorbed species on a catalyst surface. The model incorporates adsorbate-adsorbate interactions, surface diffusion, adsorption, desorption, and catalytic reaction processes using a system of ordinary differential equations. By accurately describing the adspecies ordering/arrangement with SRO parameters and utilizing the reverse Monte Carlo (RMC) method, the relevant local environment probability distributions are extracted and applied to the MKM. The resulting reaction kinetics is comparable to the kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) method but with significantly faster computational time.
We present a probabilistic microkinetic modeling (MKM) framework that incorporates the short-ranged order (SRO) evolution for adsorbed species (adspecies) on a catalyst surface. The resulting model consists of a system of ordinary differential equations. Adsorbate-adsorbate interactions, surface diffusion, adsorption, desorption, and catalytic reaction processes are included. Assuming that the adspecies ordering/arrangement is accurately described by the SRO parameters, we employ the reverse Monte Carlo (RMC) method to extract the relevant local environment probability distributions and pass them to the MKM. The reaction kinetics is faithfully captured as accurately as the kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) method but with a computational time requirement of few seconds on a standard desktop computer. KMC, on the other hand, can require several days for the examples discussed. The framework presented here is expected to provide the basis for wider application of the RMC-MKM approach to problems in computational catalysis, electrocatalysis, and material science.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据