4.5 Article

Determining levels of water-extractable and water-unextractable arabinoxylan in commercial Swedish wheat flours by a high-throughput method

期刊

JOURNAL OF CEREAL SCIENCE
卷 109, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2022.103608

关键词

Arabinoxylan; Wheat flour; Principal component analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A high-throughput method was developed to quantify water extractable arabinoxylan (WE-AX) and water unextractable arabinoxylan (WU-AX). The method showed good repeatability and was used to evaluate 197 commercial Swedish wheat flours. Results indicated higher WE-AX content in spring wheat flour compared to winter wheat flour, while winter wheat flour had higher WU-AX content. Total AX content varied significantly between harvest years and locations, suggesting an environmental impact on AX composition. This method enables high-throughput analysis of wheat flour and can be used to study the impact of endogenous AX on baking quality.
A high-throughput method for quantification of water extractable arabinoxylan (WE-AX) and water unextractable arabinoxylan (WU-AX) was adapted for and evaluated on 197 commercial Swedish wheat flours, collected continuously during harvest years 2018 and 2019. In the method, starch was hydrolysed by alpha-amylase and WE-AX was precipitated with 80% ethanol. AX residues were quantified by gas chromatography after acid hydrolysis. The method had a good repeatability (2.1% RSDr for total AX). Spring wheat flour had a higher WE-AX content (0.68%) and lower WU-AX content (1.19%) than winter wheat flour (0.56% and 1.31%). The variation of total AX content was high for winter wheat flour (1.5-2.2%), with no correlation to ash or protein content. Total AX content differed significantly both between harvest years and locations, indicating an impact from environment on AX composition. Overall, the method enabled high-throughput analysis of wheat flour and can be further used to study how endogenous AX impacts baking quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据