4.5 Article

Diacylglycerol at the inner nuclear membrane fuels nuclear envelope expansion in closed mitosis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 136, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.260568

关键词

Closed mitosis; Diacylglycerol; Nuclear envelope

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The expansion of the nuclear envelope (NE) is crucial for maintaining nuclear shape and function during cell division. The depletion of diacylglycerol (DG) from the inner nuclear membrane and the rerouting of phosphatidic acid (PA) to membrane synthesis contribute to NE expansion. The conversion of DG to PA by diacylglycerol kinase Dgk1 and the synthesis of glycerophospholipids from DG through diacylglycerol cholinephosphotransferase/ ethanolaminephosphotransferase Ept1 play important roles in controlling NE expansion and mitotic fidelity.
Nuclear envelope (NE) expansion must be controlled to maintain nuclear shape and function. The nuclear membrane expands massively during closed mitosis, enabling chromosome segregation within an intact NE. Phosphatidic acid (PA) and diacylglycerol (DG) can both serve as biosynthetic precursors for membrane lipid synthesis. How they are regulated in time and space and what the implications are of changes in their flux for mitotic fidelity are largely unknown. Using genetically encoded PA and DG probes, we show that DG is depleted from the inner nuclear membrane during mitosis in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, but PA does not accumulate, indicating that it is rerouted to membrane synthesis. We demonstrate that DG-to-PA conversion catalyzed by the diacylglycerol kinase Dgk1 (also known as Ptp4) and direct glycerophospholipid synthesis from DG by diacylglycerol cholinephosphotransferase/ ethanolaminephosphotransferase Ept1 reinforce NE expansion. We conclude that DG consumption through both the de novo pathway and the Kennedy pathway fuels a spike in glycerophospholipid biosynthesis, controlling NE expansion and, ultimately, mitotic fidelity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据