4.7 Article

Tex2 is required for lysosomal functions at TMEM55-dependent ER membrane contact sites

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
卷 222, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.202205133

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, Tex2, a lipid transfer protein found on the tubular endoplasmic reticulum, was discovered to be recruited to late endosomes/lysosomes by TMEM55, phosphatases that convert PI(4,5)P-2 to PI5P on LE/lys. The interaction between Tex2 and TMEM55 is regulated by endosome-resident type 2 PI4K activities. Tex2 knockout results in defects in lysosomal trafficking, digestive capacity, and lipid composition of LE/lys membranes. These findings highlight the importance of Tex2 in maintaining lysosomal functions through its presence at TMEM55-dependent ER-LE/lys MCSs.
ER tubules form and maintain membrane contact sites (MCSs) with late endosomes/lysosomes (LE/lys). The molecular composition and cellular functions of these MCSs are poorly understood. Here, we find that Tex2, an SMP domain-containing lipid transfer protein conserved in metazoan and yeast, is a tubular ER protein and is recruited to ER-LE/lys MCSs by TMEM55, phosphatases that convert PI(4,5)P-2 to PI5P on LE/lys. We show that the Tex2-TMEM55 interaction occurs between an N-terminal region of Tex2 and a catalytic motif in the PTase domain of TMEM55. The Tex2-TMEM55 interaction can be regulated by endosome-resident type 2 PI4K activities. Functionally, Tex2 knockout results in defects in lysosomal trafficking, digestive capacity, and lipid composition of LE/lys membranes. Together, our data identify Tex2 as a tubular ER protein that resides at TMEM55-dependent ER-LE/lys MCSs required for lysosomal functions. Du et al. show that Tex2, a potential lipid transporter on the tubular endoplasmic reticulum, is recruited to late endosomes/lysosomes by endosome-resident phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphatases TMEM55 to regulate the lipid compositions, trafficking, and the functions of lysosomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据