4.8 Article

Improving the ORR performance by enhancing the Pt oxidation resistance

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 416, 期 -, 页码 311-321

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2022.10.025

关键词

Oxygen reduction reaction; Electron microscopy; X-ray absorption spectroscopy; Density functional calculations

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/P02467X/1, EP/S018204/2, EP/K014706/2, EP/K014668/1, EP/K014854/1, EP/K014714/1, EP/M013219/1]
  2. Royal Society [RG160661, IES\R3\170097]
  3. Newton International Fellowship [NF170761]
  4. China Scholarship Council (CSC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the degradation mechanism of PdPt alloys and finds that carefully designed Pt alloy structures can control surface oxygen behavior, thereby improving ORR catalytic performance and extending the lifespan of fuel cells.
Proton exchange membrane fuel cells require oxygen reduction catalysts with high activity and stability. Pt based alloy materials are most widely applied ORR catalyst due to its high intrinsic activity, but usually suffer from rapid deactivation as a result of particle agglomeration, detachment, Ostwald ripening and/or Pt dissolution. Here we investigate the degradation of the PdPt alloys via in situ X-ray absorption fine structure, Dl analysis, identical location-electron microscopy and DFT calculations. We conclude that the origin of high activity and stability of the PdPt catalyst stems from the oxidation resistance of metallic Pt, forming mainly surface adsorbed O species at high potentials. Two stage degradation process are observed, showing an evolution of dynamic surface dependent ORR performance along with the deacti-vation process. The careful design of Pt alloy structure leads to controlled surface oxygen behaviours. This opens a new way to increase the lifespan of fuel cells and improve the Pt utilization efficiency.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据